It's Alex again and today we are debating if the verdict for a mocktrial was fair. I would say that the verdict for the trial in our debate class was not fair and the main reason is that there just wasn't enough time for everything. First the jury did not have enough time to come up with a good verdict. They were rushed in their decision. They only had probably 40, half an hour to make the decision and that's just not enough time. They were still in the middle of debating and maybe some people could have changed their minds. So again just because of the time the decision was not unanimous. in that case of hazing it was 7 0 but in manslaughter it was 4 3 something like that and I think with more time we would had a better case.
It's Alex again and today we are debating if the verdict for a mocktrial was fair. I would say that the verdict for the trial in our debate class was not fair and the main reason is that there just wasn't enough time for everything. First the jury did not have enough time to come up with a good verdict. They were rushed in their decision. They only had probably 40, half an hour to make the decision and that's just not enough time. They were still in the middle of debating and maybe some people could have changed their minds. So again just because of the time the decision was not unanimous. in that case of hazing it was 7 0 but in manslaughter it was 4 3 something like that and I think with more time we would had a better case.






It's Alex again and today we are debating if the verdict for a mocktrial was fair. I would say that the verdict for the trial in our debate class was not fair and the main reason is that there just wasn't enough time for everything. First the jury did not have enough time to come up with a good verdict. They were rushed in their decision. They only had probably 40, half an hour to make the decision and that's just not enough time. They were still in the middle of debating and maybe some people could have changed their minds. So again just because of the time the decision was not unanimous. in that case of hazing it was 7 0 but in manslaughter it was 4 3 something like that and I think with more time we would had a better case.
_0x500.jpg)





